MAMO - AI幼教精灵,以歌唱童谣的形式为孩子介绍万事万物。
MAMO-AI preschool education genie, introduces everything to children in the form of singing nursery rhymes.
MAMO通过智能识别与分析对象
实时生成孩子也能理解的童话故事
并以此为歌词生成歌曲带领孩子生动有趣地了解世界。
Through intelligent recognization and analysis of objects,
MAMO generates fairy tales in real time that children can understand
and uses them generate songs
to lead children to learn about the world
以专辑形式记录下MAMO教育孩子过程中所生成的音乐,专辑CD的音乐、封面、文本均完全由AI生成。有趣的是,当下人工智能生成音乐的训练模型中,英文歌曲占绝对数量,因此当我
们以中文儿歌为样本生成时不难发现它似乎把基调从中国变得更“西方化”了
这是否显示了西方学者在训练AI生成音乐时携带着“偏见”?在
如MAMO一样的AI技术的帮助下,发达世界的影响最终会否对
其他地区的文化与教育造成侵害?
Record the music generated in the process of MAMO's education of children in the form of an album. The com-position samples come from the well-known Chinese child-ren's songs. The music, cover and text of the album CD are completely generated by AI. What’s interesting is that in the current AI-generated music training model, English son-gs account for an absolute number, so when we gene-rate Chinese children’s songs as a sample, it is not difficult to find that it seems to have changed the atmosphere from China to more “Westernized”
Does this show that Western scholars carry "prejudices" when training AI to generate m-usic? With the help of AI technology like MAMO, will the influence of the developed world eventually cause harm to the culture and education of underdeveloped regions?
当下越来越多的学者探讨如何训练AI、如何“喂养”高质量的数据集,但却少有人探讨AI对人的“反哺”。
如果有一天人与机器的角色互换由AI来教育(训练)人类,它真的是客观且理性的吗?它又是否会在教育孩子的同时携带偏见?
At present, more and more scholars are discussing how to train AI and how to "feed" high-quality data sets, but few people discuss the "feedback" of AI to people. If one day the roles of humans and machines are exchanged and AI is used to educate (train) humans, is it really objective and rational? Does it carry prejudice while educating children?